In a sep thread on dev@apr, OtherBill appears to be trying to determine the "right" name for the APR impl... maube we should wait to see what it's decided on there and we can follow suit.
PS: What determines "abusive" usage? > On Dec 29, 2015, at 10:56 AM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >> ping. >> >> Just a reminder that right now, trunk uses ap_casecmpstr[n](), >> which can make some backport requests "problematic" due to >> possible merge conflicts. > > I've just committed (in r1722150) more reverts of abusive > ap_casecmpstr[n]() usage I introduced in r1715880. > This now leave us the attached 2.4.x backport patch should we decide > to apply these changes to 2.4.x. > >> >> Can we *please* decide what we are doing? > > I'd vote for the backport... > <httpd-2.4.x-ap_casecmpstr.patch>
