On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:26 AM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> > wrote: > > If not there is clearly a fourth state, AP_MPMQ_CHILD_STOPPING we > should > > report. > > +1 > Better yet, an AP_MPMQ_CHILD_STATE that uses the same response set but distinguishes server-stopping from process-stopping. In the single process -X model, the two responses would be identical.
