On 8 January 2016 06:23:15 GMT, "Jan Kaluža" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 01/07/2016 04:06 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> 
>>> Is this expected behaviour? Maybe the ap_get_remote_host method
>should use
>>> req->useragent_addr instead of conn->client_addr to obtain the
>REMOTE_HOST.
>>
>> what about "Require ip ..."?


“ip” is a minimal and doesn't explain much.

How about, maybe:
Require remote-ip-host 192.0.2.42/30?

I'm assuming that this would succeed  if the TCP peer is in the specified range 
OR if mod_remoteip makes a similar declaration.

-- 
Tim Bannister – [email protected]

Reply via email to