Yann, will you be doing that? Backporting the tests from:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33187&action=diff
???
> On Jan 8, 2016, at 9:34 AM, Paul Spangler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 1/8/2016 6:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Just noticed that the test framework reports issues w/ sessions on trunk:
>>
>> t/modules/session.t ................. 1/105 # Failed test 8 in
>> t/modules/session.t at line 63 fail #2
>> # Failed test 18 in t/modules/session.t at line 63 fail #4
>> # Failed test 38 in t/modules/session.t at line 63 fail #8
>> # Failed test 43 in t/modules/session.t at line 63 fail #9
>> # Failed test 48 in t/modules/session.t at line 63 fail #10
>> # Failed test 53 in t/modules/session.t at line 63 fail #11 *TODO*
>> # Failed test 54 in t/modules/session.t at line 65 fail #11 *TODO*
>> # Failed test 58 in t/modules/session.t at line 63 fail #12
>> # Failed test 63 in t/modules/session.t at line 63 fail #13
>> # Failed test 88 in t/modules/session.t at line 63 fail #18 *TODO*
>> # Failed test 89 in t/modules/session.t at line 65 fail #18 *TODO*
>> # Failed test 98 in t/modules/session.t at line 63 fail #20
>>
>> (of course, I am ignoring the TODOs)
>>
>> Can anyone confirm?
>>
> I believe this is because of the patch committed for PR 57300 (r1709121), but
> the test changes that go with it (attached to the bug report) did not get
> committed.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Paul Spangler
> LabVIEW R&D
> National Instruments
