Thx! Any other comments/suggestions?
> On Jan 8, 2016, at 10:53 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I am thinking about the actual health-check impl a bit more,
>> hence the lack of commits. As noted, initially I was thinking
>> about optional functions, defined in mod_proxy_http, mod_proxy_ajp,
>> etc. Then I started thinking that maybe doing it via providers
>> might be better, allowing for more "custom" health checks via
>> the end user. Then I started thinking about doing it rough-and-
>> ready and just adding 'em in mod_proxy_hcheck...
>>
>> Before I spend too much time on this, any prefs one way or
>> another regarding this?
>
> I haven't looked at the architecture so far -- but I think basics in
> mod_proxy_hcheck
> and at least one "standalone" provider (as an example) would be a good
> middle ground.
>
> Maybe the standalone one would try to deal with the body whereas the
> built-in ones
> would be TCP up, SSL up, status-code, etc.
