I can't recreate that... did you do a clean build?
> On Jan 11, 2016, at 4:56 AM, Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/10/2016 08:20 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> Author: jim
>> Date: Sun Jan 10 19:20:31 2016
>> New Revision: 1723953
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1723953&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Use enums and structs to keep things better organized
>>
>> Modified:
>> httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h
>> httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_hcheck.c
>>
>> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h?rev=1723953&r1=1723952&r2=1723953&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h (original)
>> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h Sun Jan 10 19:20:31 2016
>> @@ -75,6 +75,26 @@ enum enctype {
>> enc_path, enc_search, enc_user, enc_fpath, enc_parm
>> };
>>
>> +typedef enum {
>> + NONE, TCP, OPTIONS, HEAD, GET, CPING, PROVIDER, EOT
>> +} hcmethod_t;
>> +
>> +typedef struct {
>> + hcmethod_t method;
>> + char *name;
>> +} hcmethods_t;
>> +
>> +static hcmethods_t hcmethods[] = {
>> + {NONE, "NONE"},
>> + {TCP, "TCP"},
>> + {OPTIONS, "OPTIONS"},
>> + {HEAD, "HEAD"},
>> + {GET, "GET"},
>> + {CPING, "CPING"},
>> + {PROVIDER, "PROVIDER"},
>> + {EOT, NULL}
>> +};
>
> Shouldn't the above move over to mod_proxy.c ?
>
> Otherwise we see
>
> mod_proxy.h:87: warning: ‘hcmethods’ defined but not used
>
> numerous time from c files where mod_proxy.h gets included but hcmethods not
> used.
>
> Regards
>
> Rüdiger
