Forward doesn’t mean dynamic, however, and using one particular solution like that is misleading, IMO. Using “forward-dns” makes more sense to me.
That said, how would you intend to handle multiple A records for the same name: look them all up and store in a table, or support only one A record per name? At a minimum, I think that needs to be clearly documented. Rick Houser From: Yehuda Katz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 10:09 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: access control for dynamic hosts dyndns is a company name, but it seems to be synonymous for a lot of systems with dynamic-dns. That would make a recognizable option for a lot of people. - Y On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:53 AM, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Maybe "Require ip" could be extended instead of using a new name: > > "Require ip myserver.apache.org<http://myserver.apache.org>" Unfortunately I think you need to pick an awkward name here so it cannot be confused/misused. Like "forward-dns" -- Eric Covener [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
