On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> >> Hmmm... iirc, if there is a mismatch, the old files are >> automagically removed. > > You are right, I was still influenced by PR58024 triggering AH02599 > (painful fix), but that was due to the missing unlink() semantic on > Windows... > > I still think AH02599 can be triggered on unclean shutdown, with name > based SHMs when the cleanup is not called (this has nothing to do with > mod_proxy_hcheck, though). > > Couldn't we use anonymous SHMs for slotmem_shm(s) since we > create/destroy them for each restart anyway? > I don't think the apr_shm_attach() path in slotmem_create() should > ever be hit (thanks to the caching of in 'globallistmem' of the > process' created SHMs, and other processes should use slotmem_attach() > anyway). > Hmm, I may miss some Windows MPM thingy again...
Nevermind, we still need to attach() in children processes!
