Can you do a quick check that HEAD of 2.4 builds for you? THX!!
> On Mar 23, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: > > Indeed wrowe did not change any .dsp files. and the changes from wrowe does > not break a .dsp build. > > My attention was just the statement of wrowe that .dsp files are not usable, > which is not true. > > > > On Wednesday 23/03/2016 at 12:20, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <php...@ehrhardt.nl> wrote: >>> Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:15:45 +0100): >>>> Saw that wrowe did a change win make files in 2.4. branche. >>>> >>>> The comment says the the .dsp files are entirely ! unusable. >>>> >>>> I can tell that they are entirely usable with V9-VC14. What was the issue ? >>> >>> I agree with Steffen. This week I have built httpd 2.4.19 (VC9 / VC11 / >>> VC14 & x86 / x64) using the .dsp files. I even commented that the >>> http2.dsp was missing a line. They are the easiest way to build httpd on >>> Windows. >> >> Does building 2.4.x from the .dsp files still work or not? >> >> AIUI (but my understanding of Windows is quite limited), Bill did not >> change any dsp file (but removing mod_lbmethod_rr which did not work), >> he "just" added some .mak and .dep files. >> Why would that break dsp files? > >
