On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: > > To me it looks like the "right" way of handling SSLProxy* config would be > per <Proxy>.
++1 > Did anyone else already encounter a similar problem? Any > thoughts or experiments on how to solve this for the future? Not sure how to handle this since <Proxy> is in mod_proxy whereas SSLProxy* are in mod_ssl. <Proxy> is a dir_config still, not sure how we could make it available/shared in/with mod_ssl... Regards, Yann.
