Grrr... w/o looking too deeply into this, this seems very wrong. Is that a long-standing bug or something recently "optimized" away?
> On Apr 26, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Stefan Eissing <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Today I Learned the difference between writing > DATA + META > and > DATA + META + FLUSH > to the core output filters. I am astonished that > my code ever worked. > > Seriously, what is the reason for this kind of > implementation? I would like to pass META buckets > in non-blocking way and *not* lose the order of > bucket destruction. Any explanation or advice is > appreciated! > > Cheers, > > Stefan
