On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On 06/21/2016 05:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Just retested on 2.4.x branch, better but still problematic... > > Would that suit better (against current 2.4.x): > > Index: config.m4 > =================================================================== > --- config.m4 (revision 1749588) > +++ config.m4 (working copy) > @@ -13,9 +13,17 @@ > if test "$proxy_mods_enable" = "no"; then > enable_proxy_hcheck=no > fi > -dnl If enable_proxy_hcheck is unset handle it like other proxy modules > +dnl If enable_proxy_hcheck is unset handle it like other proxy modules if > +dnl it is able to disable itself. If not do not enable it. > if test -z "$enable_proxy_hcheck" ; then > - enable_proxy_hcheck="$proxy_mods_enable" > + case "$proxy_mods_enable" in > + yes|static|shared) > + enable_proxy_hcheck=no > + ;; > + *) > + enable_proxy_hcheck="$proxy_mods_enable" > + ;; > + esac > fi > Have a look at r1749658 & r1749659 for the simplest solution I could come up with, and let me know what you think? Off to purge my skull of m4 syntax again with some /r/Eyebleach/
