On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:24 AM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote:
> So digging deeper, this just seemed odd until I found... > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:05 AM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Jens Schleusener < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Just for curiosity I copied the soure code via >>> >>> svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x >>> >>> src/httpd-2.4.x> ./buildconf >>> >>> src/httpd-2.4.x> ./configure --enable-mods-shared=few >>> >>> configure: loading site script /usr/share/site/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu >>> checking for chosen layout... Apache >>> [... many lines deleted ...] >>> checking whether to enable mod_proxy_express... no (few) >>> checking whether to enable mod_proxy_hcheck... checking dependencies >>> configure: WARNING: "mod_proxy is disabled but required for >>> mod_proxy_hcheck" >>> checking whether to enable mod_proxy_hcheck... configure: error: >>> mod_proxy_hcheck has been requested but can not be built due to >>> prerequisite failures >>> >>> So it appears not the identical but a similar failure compared to that >>> one I reported some days ago ("Small problem in "configure" script with >>> 2.4.21"): Now "mod_watchdog" is replaced by "mod_proxy". >>> >>> And again: Since the option "--enable-mods-shared=few" doesn't include >>> any "proxy"-related modules I also don't expect to build the "reverse-proxy >>> health-check module". >>> >>> I am not sure if there is still a problem or if my "configure" building >>> and testing is incorrect. >>> >> >> There is still a problem, and it relates to a special case handling >> of the underlying 'few' token. Found it, more updates shortly... >> > > case "$enable_proxy_hcheck" in > yes|static|shared) > _apmod_required="yes" > ;; > *) > case "$module_selection" in > reallyall|all|most) > _apmod_required="no" > ;; > *) > _apmod_required="yes" > ;; > esac > esac > > What is going on here is that choosing few|none actually causes > every module dependency mismatch to become fatal, even if the > specific modules are not requested. > > I believe this should be reduced in every module's test to simply; > > case "$enable_proxy_hcheck" in > yes|static|shared) > _apmod_required="yes" > ;; > *) > _apmod_required="no" > esac > > Comments? > Well, a +1 from trawick, anyways... http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1396440 Thus, Jim, you couldn't see this issue pop on trunk, because it was fixed almost 4 years ago.
