The wording change seems fine to me, I'd actually be fine with simply dropping your last sentence entirely. Our config defaults speak for themselves.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com> wrote: > We had a couple of people complaining about the language around TRACE in > the docs, which say disabling TRACE "makes your server noncompliant", a > claim I found hard to support. > > All methods but HEAD and GET are defined as OPTIONAL, so I'm not sure > how this is true, am I missing something? > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-5.1.1 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-4.1 > > Is that choice of words just to scare people off? IIRC there are some > pretty strong opinions on this; attached is how I'd change it. >
