On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > "The Last-Modified header value '%s' (parsed assuming the GMT timezone) > has > > been replaced with '%s' because considered in the future." > > Looks good to me (maybe "(GMT)" only between parentheses?). > > The original log message can still be switched to a comment, though ;) > I'm not fond of the 'assuming' thing, per RFC2616 it *is* defined as GMT. (parsed as GMT, as required) might be a way to phrase that? Other words that came to mind were 'as defined', 'per spec', etc. Showing a value 'datetime (CEST)' (GMT) is unnecessarily confusing.
