I've sent a note to the z/OS Unix mailing list in hopes someone can
distill the confusing over how 0x15 and 0x25  EBCDIC seem to be
interpreted differently.  0x15 is kind of weird but 0x25 is hard to
justify.

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I notice ebcdic-us.c in apr-iconv has this mapping instead of 0x85
>
> iconv on linux acts like the apr-iconv table, though.



-- 
Eric Covener
[email protected]

Reply via email to