2016-08-12 10:27 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com>: > > > 2016-08-11 18:14 GMT+02:00 William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>: > >> Hi Luca, >> >> it helps at this point in the discussions to post the delta to >> branches/2.4.x, >> for all of us to see the delta between 'current' and 'prospective' >> behaviors, >> and ignoring the status of trunk for the moment. >> >> Attached is that delta... >> >> > Thanks a lot William, you are completely right. I created another proposal > that might be a bit better (apologies in advance if my english is not good > enough): > > 1) diff with current trunk: http://apaste.info/ck8 > 2) complete diff from 2.4.x: http://apaste.info/dtI > > In this way the following use cases will be covered by only one log: > > 1) (F)CGI backend sends a Last-Modified header not in GMT and considered > in the future by httpd (like now() in the EU/Paris timezone) - first log > 2) (F)CGI backend sends a Last-Modified header not in GMT and not > considered in the future by httpd (like now() + 2 hours in the US West > timezone) - second log > 3) (F)CGI backend sends a Last-Modified header in GMT but with a datetime > in the future - third log > > Manually tested in trunk and it seems working fine, but if we reach > consensus this would also need a test in the httpd suite. > > Simplified a bit the wording and added more comments: http://apaste.info/m8v (diff with current trunk). The use cases are the same as the ones described in my previous email.
William (and everybody that wants to give me feedback), would you mind to review the logs and let me know your thoughts? Luca
