All syntax checks are done inside mod_macro.
I agree that changing the syntax would be cleaner, but that would
probably take some time.
Until that, a warning is better than nothing, no? We could also raise
the warning to an error but I suppose some peopel may complain about
backward compatibility...
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 10:06:22, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Nick Gearls <nickgea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't think mod_macro should emit a warning for its own basic
>> configuration
>
> That's what it currently does (in 2.4)
Isn't it the core currently and not mod_macro? Which is why my
preference is to advocate a syntax that isn't ambiguous/clashy (this
might be more than a docs change, from my recollection of the last
discussion about which of the supported syntaxes was least
harmless/confusing)
