On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jacob Champion <[email protected]> wrote:
> [spec discussion] > > On 11/04/2016 09:40 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> There is even an example with no scheme: >>> >>> Location: /People.html#tim >>> >> >> Not valid as a request (fragment not allowed) >> > > ...but what does that have to do with the Location header? This is a valid > and useful Location header value. (Clients won't send the fragment during > the redirect; they'll save it to use during later presentation of the > resource.) Yup, this is an interesting point/question. Location header value != Request line URI value.
