On 2016-11-24 03:33, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote: > I agree that it should work with current TLS versions, but I have current no > time to > dig further.
At least I know now that I'm not off when I say: it should work. That's why I asked here on the dev list, because people who know the code might have an idea where the problem is right away. Maybe somebody else will be able to answer my question or tell me how to fix this. > As it is changed in the SPEC it is a design problem, otherwise just the > software > implementing it would need to be fixed. That was my point actually. Fixing the design makes no sense, if the implementation sucks. It's not the first time though that just all implementations are at a fault. That's why I asked, I just didn't know. Cheers, K. C. -- regards Helmut K. C. Tessarek lookup http://pool.sks-keyservers.net for KeyID 0xC11F128D /* Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for chaos and madness await thee at its end. */
