On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Do we want this for the 2.2 release? > > I don't feel strongly about this. > > It is such an unusual edge case (I believe Yann pointed out it was a custom > module he was working around) that it should rarely be seen in the wild. > > I'd be fine if we want to accelerate this into 2.2.32, or get 2.2.32 > out and then > backport to have the patch available for the very few who are impacted.
Agreed, I wouldn't push it, and can live with a my own patching. Possibly another module/cgi uses that CRLF to LWS trick though, but not that I'm aware of so..
