Bill wrote: >I think one of our disconnects with 2.4 -> 2.6 is that in any other framework, >there would be > no ABI breakage in 2.6. That breakage would be deferred to and shipped as > 3.0.
Huh? For just one single, simple example, what about APR?? Are we going to now redefine the standards of semantic versioning?? I really don't see how this corrects the "issue" at hand, unless we are constantly also redefining what the "issue" actually is, in which case I grow tired of playing fetch me a rock :)
