Just created it. Put Jacob, Daniel, and yourself on Cc.
> On Mar 30, 2017, at 4:32 PM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Philip Prindeville > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I’ve not heard back so I’m going to go ahead and file a bug as a placekeeper. > > +1 (I'm not seeing this yet.) > >>> On Mar 29, 2017, at 7:04 PM, Philip Prindeville >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> to allow access contingent on the presence of a flag, it should also be >>> possible to do the inverse: allow access contingent on the absence of a >>> flag: >>> >>> <Location /> >>> Require not env is_a_bogon >>> </Location> >>> >>> More broadly on a philosophical level, looking at Comment 3 by Daniel Gruno: >>> >>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53069#c3 >>> >>> He writes: >>> >>> “[…] I have made some changes to the access howto to emphasize that a >>> negation cannot stand on its own.” >>> >>> Just out of curiosity, why can’t it stand on its own? >>> >>> I don’t see anything intrinsically wrong about gating on the _absence_ of >>> _negative factors_. > > This is complete nonsense IMO, a basic CS 101 failure. Can any > of the authors or maintainers explain?
