/me confused. Why the -1 again? Are you having problems building brotli? Or is it that you don't like how brotli is being built? Or what?
> On Apr 11, 2017, at 1:08 AM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:25 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Author: wrowe >> Date: Tue Apr 11 04:25:34 2017 >> New Revision: 1790917 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1790917&view=rev >> Log: >> Veto veto of veto >> >> Modified: >> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS >> >> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1790917&r1=1790916&r2=1790917&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) >> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Tue Apr 11 04:25:34 2017 >> @@ -190,6 +190,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: >> http://svn.apache.org/r1790853 >> http://svn.apache.org/r1790860 >> +1: jim, jorton, >> + -1: wrowe (build schema of 0.6.0 is as worthless as 0.5.2, git master >> + is still entirely functional, apparently waiting for 1.0.0) > > > I suggest we just give up for this cycle. Quoting README.md from 0.6.0... > > To build and run tests, simply do: > > $ ./configure && make > > If you want to install brotli, use one of the more advanced build systems > below. > > #### Bazel > > See [Bazel](http://www.bazel.build/) > > #### CMake > > The basic commands to build, test and install brotli are: > > $ mkdir out && cd out && ../configure-cmake && make > $ make test > $ make install > > You can use other [CMake](https://cmake.org/) configuration. For example, to > build static libraries and use a custom installation directory: > > [...] > > > [wrowe@hub Brotli-0.6.0]$ ls > common dec include MANIFEST.in python setup.cfg tools > CONTRIBUTING.md enc LICENSE PKG-INFO README.md setup.py > > > That's adorkable :) And also an unusable package. I was trying to > review to simply determine if the command-line utility ('/usr/bin/bro', > which conflicts with Ubuntu and RedHat packages) had actually > been adjusted to a unique name, but no... no such luck.
