I doubt now. It was based on a note in cvtdsp.pl. Maybe it is only a .dsp and xml change, which I can apply to 1.5.
Maybe Gregg can shed some light on this ? > Op 28 apr. 2017 om 22:16 heeft William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> het > volgende geschreven: > > Now that these are independent of one another, I think we can release before > 1.6.x are released. We should just call out "New: OpenSSL 1.1.0 support! > (Upcoming APR 1.6.x is required for this support.) > > > >> On Apr 28, 2017 2:56 PM, "Steffen" <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: >> When with apr & apr-until 1.6 fine even more cooler. Otherwise OpenSSL 1.1 >> not supported. >> >> For OpenSSL 1.1 we need apr & apr-util 1.6 to build (e.g apr_crypto_openssl >> for mod_session crypto) >> >> >> > Op 28 apr. 2017 om 14:14 heeft Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> het >> > volgende geschreven: >> > >> > It would be cool to have 2.4.26 released by ApacheCon, or even >> > by OSCON. There are, last I checked, 2 showstoppers on list for >> > 2.4.26... Anyway we could address them and shoot for a T&R maybe >> > next Weds? >>
