On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:12 PM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > > The alternative I prefer is to roll with the final apr[-util] 1.5 releases > as the 2.2.32 tarball had, and include the same warning as given > in the 2.2 release announcement;
+1 > > Thoughts/comments? Patches to hold for before we roll? If I don't hear > otherwise, and we stick to the simpler alternative, then I'd plan to roll > these candidates Thursday. Three patches (missing a single vote) in STATUS already, +1 with them in. Thanks Bill to take care of the old lady :)
