We can wait. No reason to rush if we can hold off for a bit and ensure that 2.4.28 is as ready to go as possible.
> On Sep 22, 2017, at 1:23 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> STATUS looks clean. >> >> Hoping to do a T&R this afternoon, eastern, unless I hear >> any objections or concerns re: timing. > > svn looks good here. Only one potentially missed item IMO, it could wait > till 2.4.29, but if we hear right back from jorton or rpluem on the readiness > of the patch, I'd love to see us quit consuming extra memory r.e. PR61222, > so the backport has my +1 already. If you look at comments in this ticket, > the review has already happened and everyone seemed mostly satisfied. > > Suggesting a parallel apr/-util release over on dev@apr. Thanks for RM'ing!
