On 01/12/2018 01:50 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote:
>> Yann: it is not working (anymore) when you have only port 443 open.
>> Yann: I am/was testing in real live, no boulder.
>> Eric: proposed change:  to begin with warns/errors user
>> I am talking about SSL configurations without port 80 open. It is not an
>> individual issue, there are more around with no port 80 open. So it is not
>> only for me !!!
> Sounds like a minor documentation issue for the current limitation in
> some configurations.
> Generally, we don't use -1 for something like that. Although not all
> -1's are actually "vetoes" -- it is still reserved for something
> actively detrimental.

While I guess it is neither official nor documented I think best practice for 
cases of a strong opinion but no veto is
to use either

-1 (no veto)



That's at least what I have seen and what I would do in such cases.



Reply via email to