On 01/12/2018 01:50 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: >> Yann: it is not working (anymore) when you have only port 443 open. >> Yann: I am/was testing in real live, no boulder. >> Eric: proposed change: to begin with warns/errors user >> >> I am talking about SSL configurations without port 80 open. It is not an >> individual issue, there are more around with no port 80 open. So it is not >> only for me !!! >> > > Sounds like a minor documentation issue for the current limitation in > some configurations. > > Generally, we don't use -1 for something like that. Although not all > -1's are actually "vetoes" -- it is still reserved for something > actively detrimental. >
While I guess it is neither official nor documented I think best practice for cases of a strong opinion but no veto is to use either -1 (no veto) or -0.5 That's at least what I have seen and what I would do in such cases. Regards RĂ¼diger