On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:29 PM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >>> Moving a member in a well-defined structure doesn't fall into this >>> generally accepted change (expanding the length of a struct.) >>> Consider the shm array change doesn't fall into the "it is just >>> a longer struct" example. >> >> Can you please give me a pointer which shm array change you are referring to? > > r1824504
I'm not sure it falls outside our guarantees, the old "hostname" field is still there (at the same place) and populated.
