On 18/03/2018 05:32, Nick Kew wrote:

> On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 09:06:53 -0400
> Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I think bump trunk now, but not rip out any compat code for ease of
>> backport.
> 
> +1.
> 
> 2.4 is a stable branch: we can't go making changes that would
> disrupt existing users.

+1 

agreed, bump it to >= 1.0.2 for trunk/2.6,  but don't mess with 2.4, I'm
sure that will backfire in spectacular ways 

(A colleague reading this over my shoulder, just said " fastest way for
me to stop updating apache"  my comment was, what a bout critical bug
finds, his reply "fasted way for me to move to nginx ") 

> What we could do is make it an annoying (even scary) Warning
> in 2.4, and see what reactions that brings.

Why? most software with "major" version releases have minimum
requirements, openssl will just be one of them for httpd, no need to
terrorise innocent sys admins just for your jollies   :) 

-- 
Kind Regards, 

Noel Butler 

                This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally 
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright
protected under international law. You may not disseminate, discuss, or
reveal, any part, to anyone, without the authors express written
authority to do so. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
the sender then delete all copies of this message including attachments,
immediately. Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not
waived or lost by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message. Only
PDF [1] and ODF [2] documents accepted, please do not send proprietary
formatted documents 

 

Links:
------
[1] http://www.adobe.com/
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument

Reply via email to