It is indeed a limitation for an "old" account, and when LE enables
TLS again (not sure it does already in ACMEv2 protocol)
You can have mod_md for a few domains and other domains with a client.
This a a conf most AL admin/users are using till now, special the
seasoned admin's.
In my test mod_md says;
mod_md.c(1317): [client 2001:980:a510:1:c5e7:56f7:9d:ab36:65315]
Challenge for www.apachelounge.com
(/.well-known/acme-challenge/test.txt)
For me case closed., sorry for the clutter.
For me not related to a vote, therefore I made a seperate topic.
It is not "ÿour user" but our user :)
As I said:
Not sure it is an issue.
and
correct me if I am wrong
I just trying to help admin/users out there which where early
adopters.
When it is not appreciated that I share it with dev, say it please.
On Sunday 18/03/2018 at 18:48, Eric Covener wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com>
wrote:
A note from admin/user at
http://www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36619#36619
Asked the reporter to file at bugzilla:
Not sure it is a issue.
A suggestion from me for the official release:
I would not publish the official release with mod_md, but offer the
two
modules (mod_md & mod_ssl) separately for download.
For mod_ssl to work in the vote release, mod_md must also be included
and
mod_md will catch access to the .well-know directory. In other words:
With
the Vote release it's not possible to use Lets-Encrypt-Win-Simple (I
think).
My response to that:
I think you mean with win-acme client
When it is true what you say then in the Linux world they could maybe
not
use e.g. their Certbot client either.
I would like to see that a Linux users tries it ?
This is all quite difficult to parse for me.
Is your user saying that loading mod_md blocks some mode of operation
of an external acme client? By handling request for /.well-known?
I don't think such a thing impacts the release vote or structure
unless it's a regression of using the two things together, and there's
no implication that it is.
After all, mod_md is optional, and its primary role is certificates
via ACME. I don't see the dilemma, so maybe I am misinterpreting
Spelling out whatever requirement or concern in at the root of this,
in more precise detail, is probably the only way it will move forward.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
