On 26 Mar 2018, at 6:13 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it really all that bothersome and problematic that we need to change > things so much? What this does is add complexity and process > to the addition of CHANGES where, IMO, it doesn't belong. I > can't see adding all this overhead simply to fix cases where someone > needs to handle a merge for a back port. The cure seems worse > than the disease (and symptoms).
Initially I thought hmmm… interesting, and then I remembered we have MMN bumps that conflict as well and have to be resolved. I’m also seeing the solution as worse than the problem. The conflict in a backport and how to resolve it are well understood, I’m not seeing the advantage. Regards, Graham —
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
