On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Yann; > I'm out of town and far from a usable system to investigate the code at the > moment. On a quick review, this doesn't ring a bell. I assume it came with > the original code donation. Seems to make sense since originally this > functionality was all in it's own module. Based on the context, I am > guessing you've detected the config struct is created and set twice, thus > losing potential parameters. If that's the case, I'm confident removing the > second occurrence should be fine.
Ok, thanks Daniel (and sorry for the inconvenience).
