> On Aug 6, 2018, at 1:37 PM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is anyone else disappointed in the number of regressions in 2.4.35? > Could you point them out?
- Wherefor 2.4.36? William A Rowe Jr
- Re: Wherefor 2.4.36? William A Rowe Jr
- Re: Wherefor 2.4.36? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Wherefor 2.4.36? Noel Butler
- Re: Wherefor 2.4.36? Micha Lenk
- Re: Wherefor 2.4.36? Michael-Fever
- Re: Wherefor 2.4.36? Daniel Ruggeri
- Re: Wherefor 2.4.36? Graham Leggett
- Re: Wherefor 2.4.36? Stefan Eissing
- Re: Wherefor 2.4.36? William A Rowe Jr
