> On Sep 12, 2018, at 4:14 PM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 8:01 AM Jim Jagielski <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > If there is still interest, there are a handful of useful backports in STATUS > that could use review, testing and voting :-) > > Unless the goal is to replace one set of regressions with a new set > of regressions, it's past due to tag 2.4.35 before "useful" returns as > the de facto criteria again on 2.4.x. >
Certainly that is up to the RM and the people reviewing, testing and voting on the backports...
