On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:20 PM William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:09 PM Evgeny Kotkov <evgeny.kot...@visualsvn.com> 
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> However, a more important question is whether there is an actual problem to
>> solve.  I see that ap_http_header_filter() features a whitelist of headers
>> that are sent for 304 responses (http_filters.c:1428), and all headers such
>> as Content-Encoding are filtered anyway.
>
>
> AIUI Transfer-* headers should be filtered. Content-* headers must match
> the specific ETag as if the response was 200, from my reading.

I'm reading the below as a "SHOULD NOT" for anything other than:
Cache-Control, Content-Location, Date, ETag, Expires, and Vary.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7232#section-4.1 :

   Since the goal of a 304 response is to minimize information transfer
   when the recipient already has one or more cached representations, a
   sender SHOULD NOT generate representation metadata other than the
   above listed fields unless said metadata exists for the purpose of
   guiding cache updates (e.g., Last-Modified might be useful if the
   response does not have an ETag field).

I may be missing something but it seems to me that Content-Encoding
shouldn't be set, "Vary: Accept-Encoding" is how we tell that content
encoders (deflate, brotli...) are (or could be) in the place.

Reply via email to