Which is why we allow for both pre-send checks and out-of-band health checks...
> On Nov 5, 2018, at 10:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The last thing we want are the routing headaches of contacting an > ever-changing list one-or-many potential balancers. And we can't > rely on a dying lbmember to "check in" that it isn't functional. Since > the balancer must already start requests to the backend, having that > backend supplement the responses with its health status is simple.
