> On Jan 9, 2019, at 7:41 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> Does CFLAGS -std=c99 solve your issue? It seems to work here. I'm building on 
> the Fedora 29, largely frozen end-of-july. Reverting the patch below and 
> toggling -std=c89 to -std=c99 in configure.in <http://configure.in/> building 
> all but two modules from trunk is building clean, and results in this command 
> for error checking;
> /usr/lib64/apr-1/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc  -pthread -std=c99 
> -Werror -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations 
> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wpointer-arith -Wformat -Wformat-security 
> Is it reasonable to enforce c99 limitations at this late date? I'm not 
> suggesting we change the general builds from c89 in the 2.4 branch, but that 
> is something we might want to consider for trunk, 20 years out.

Personally, I'd be fine allowing c99 in both 2.4 and trunk, considering that we 
are in 2019 already :)

Any platform that lacks a c99 compatible CC likely doesn't build anyway.

Reply via email to