An aside r.e. subversion; Just please don't do what gstein has warned us against. I've performed the ill-advised jump-over abandoned work in the past; svn rm ^/httpd/mod_foo/trunk svn cp ^/httpd/mod_foo/trunk@123456 ^/httpd/mod_foo/trunk attempting to drop activity between 123457 and present. Greg advised us this turns out to do some ugly rebasing leaving a very ugly mess of records in the underlying database. Anyone from subversion team could give a better explanation why this is badness. This might look like a reversion, but don't do this.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:00 PM Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's subversion, not git - we can always revert ;p >
