Yep, CentOS5. Mostly due to the fact that regressions would likely show up more readily on older OSs rather than newer ones.
Plus, there's still a crap-ton of systems using CentOS5/RHEL5 > On Mar 28, 2019, at 8:51 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com> wrote: > > > > > C2 General > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 13:39 >> An: httpd <dev@httpd.apache.org> >> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39 >> >> >>> On Mar 27, 2019, at 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, all; >>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >>> >>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this >> candidate tarball as 2.4.39: >>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! >>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. >>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. >>> >>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: >>> sha1: e66d6bfea42254e64d3b5009f49ecc486ac46de2 *httpd-2.4.39.tar.gz >>> sha256: >> 8b95fe249f3a6c50aad3ca125eef3e02d619116cde242e1bc3c266b7b5c37c30 *httpd- >> 2.4.39.tar.gz >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Ruggeri >> >> Tested and passed on the following systems (no regressions): >> >> o macOS 10.14.4, Xcode 10.2 >> o CentOS 5, 64bit > > Really CentOS 5? Just asking because it does not receive further OS updates > and I wouldn't recommend to use it any longer. > > Regards > > Rüdiger
