On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 09:35:09PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > On 10/25/2019 12:52 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > My feeling is that it's easier to start from trunk, no strong feeling > > (an intuitive one). > > > > So how about: > > 0. github workflow? meanwhile... > > 1. compare trunk/2.4.x (inventory) > > 2. discuss unused/deprecated in trunk to cleanup > > 3. address STALLED entries in trunk if it's not for compatibily reasons > > 4. do API/ABI breaking changes in trunk > > 5. improve trunk w/ things we want in 2.6.x (the real part!) > > 6. trunk => 2.6.x > > 7. remove from 2.6.x things not deprecated in 2. but w/ no champion either > > 8. 2.6.alpha/beta/gamma/rc/whatever > > 9. fix in trunk and backport to 2.6.x > > 10. if not good enough goto 8. > > 11. 2.6.0 > > 12+ usual release cycle > > ? > > > > If in 1. we find that 2.4.x => 2.6.x is easier/better, well just > > replace 2. with that and drop 6. and 7. > > +1 to the above, with a preference to branch from trunk if possible.
+1 also and a strong preference to branch from trunk. Regards, Joe
