On 02/21/2020 02:23 PM, Steffen wrote: > I run without it. > > Does that have a draw back ? Removing it likely breaks the Unix builds. So we need to have a solution in place that works on Windows and Unix and I believe the solution from Yann does. Hence it would be very helpful if you could verify this part of the assumption on Windows side. I guess their are plenty of people here (as well as our current Travis jobs) who can verify for the Unix side, but not much for the Windows side. Regards RĂ¼diger
- Branches 2.4.12-dev fails mod_ssl Steffen
- Re: Branches 2.4.12-dev fails mod_ssl Yann Ylavic
- Re: Branches 2.4.12-dev fails mod_ssl Ruediger Pluem
- Re: Branches 2.4.12-dev fails mod_ssl Steffen
- Re: Branches 2.4.12-dev fails mod_ssl Ruediger Pluem
- Re: Branches 2.4.12-dev fails mod_ssl Yann Ylavic
- Re: Branches 2.4.12-dev fails mod_ssl Luca Toscano
- Re: Branches 2.4.12-dev fails mod_ssl Steffen
- Re: Branches 2.4.12-dev fails mod_ssl Steffen
- Re: Branches 2.4.12-dev fails mod_ssl Steffen
- Re: Branches 2.4.12-dev fails mod_ssl Yann Ylavic