On 6/26/20 12:01 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 8:57 AM Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/25/20 2:16 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:27 PM Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 6/25/20 12:13 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>>> Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c
>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>> --- modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c (revision 1879145)
>>>>> +++ modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c (working copy)
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -987,10 +991,10 @@ PROXY_DECLARE(int) ap_proxy_trans_match(request_re
>>>>> "URI path '%s' matches proxy handler '%s'", r->uri,
>>>>> found);
>>>>>
>>>>> - return OK;
>>>>> + return servlet ? DONE : OK;
>>>>
>>>> Why setting it to DONE in the servlet case? Wouldn't that cause
>>>> ap_process_request_internal to be left early?
>>>
>>> No, ap_process_request_internal() would just skip r->uri decoding (we
>>> are in pre_trans hook here, since mapping=servlet only happens there).
>>> Anyway, it's an orthogonal change sorry, maybe we still want uri
>>> decoding for directory/location walk in the servlet case, but since
>>> this patch actually modifies r->uri (while other proxy mappings do
>>> not), I thought it could be the final transformation (that's DONE
>>> returned from pre_trans).
>>
>> Sorry, but I am still struggling: This is from server/request.c starting
>> line 233
>>
>> 233 access_status = ap_run_pre_translate_name(r);
>> 234 if (access_status != OK && access_status != DECLINED) {
>> 235 return access_status;
>> 236 }
>
> Ah yes sorry, I missed you were referring to this initial commit.
> It was later changed (http://svn.apache.org/r1879137) like this:
Sorry my bad :-(. I missed to svn up my working copy when trying to understand
the attached patch,
hence the questions. With r1879137 I am fine. Sorry for the noise.
Regards
RĂ¼diger