On 15 Jul 2020, at 16:18, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: > You're already changing the API ... why not simply introduce insert_prop_v2() > with the appropriate parameters? This concept of "pass parameters via the > pool" is very disturbing.
Changes to these provider APIs can’t be backported, thus the pool. Separately I’d like to change the signature of insert_prop(), but that’s a separate patch. Not seeing any point in insert_prop_v2() if backporting isn't possible, rather keep it clean and have one API that does the right thing in v2.6 onwards. Regards, Graham —
