On 10 Dec 2020, at 18:04, yla...@apache.org wrote: > Author: ylavic > Date: Thu Dec 10 16:04:34 2020 > New Revision: 1884280 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1884280&view=rev > Log: > Revert r1480058, -1'ed on dev@ and STATUS. > > Never backported (and never will supposedly), while often creating > merge conflicts.
You’ve just reverted a fix to an RFC violation that was picked up by the CoAdvisor test suite. “Creating merge conflicts” is not a sufficient technical justification for a veto that results in the re-introduction of an RFC violation. Please back this out. > See > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/be0e7bdc3510fddd2dd80accece44917eba361ef4fcc713dd0f7f7fa%401367999236%40%3Cdev.httpd.apache.org%3E > and > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6e63271b308a2723285d288857318e7bb51b6756690514d9bc75a71b%401371148914%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6e63271b308a2723285d288857318e7bb51b6756690514d9bc75a71b@1371148914@%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E> Please resolve the discussion above. The last on the thread is that Roy was asked for advice, but he was busy. In the light of RFC7230 it would be useful to get a new answer on this question. Regards, Graham —
