On 12/11/20 3:11 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:04 PM Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 01:48:39PM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:59 PM Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 12/11/20 12:30 PM, Travis CI wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> branch icon2.4.x <https://github.com/apache/httpd/tree/2.4.x>
>>>>>
>>>>> build has failed
>>>>
>>>> I think this is exposed by r1883752 
>>>> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1883752),
>>>
>>> The old code would also have abort()ed on a NULL pool.
>>>
>>>> but the real root cause is the
>>>> missing backport of r1876626 
>>>> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1876626) to 2.4.x. 
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Good catch! +1 for backport.
>>
>> +1 from me too, can we get a third?

+1 from me.

> 
> Those:
> 
>   *) core: reset ap_runtime_dir to NULL after AP_SQ_MS_DESTROY_CONFIG.
>   *) mod_http2: stop/wait the workers threads before their pool is killed.

I will have a look separately.

Regards

RĂ¼diger

> 
> in STATUS already are also about making the ci pass on 2.4.x with the
> same set as trunk.
> 
> +1s are welcome (and easy I think) there too :)
> 
> 
> Regards;
> Yann.
> 

Reply via email to