Ha! Misery loves company, it seems... ;-) More constructive: with modern computers that fast, should we add a dependency of log-tags to the default build targets? or at least "install" or somesuch?
The machines are made to serve! > Am 09.03.2021 um 19:15 schrieb [email protected]: > > Author: ylavic > Date: Tue Mar 9 18:15:22 2021 > New Revision: 1887390 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1887390&view=rev > Log: > Fix APLOGNO(10258) missing from r1887384. > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/http/http_etag.c > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/http/http_etag.c > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/http/http_etag.c?rev=1887390&r1=1887389&r2=1887390&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/http/http_etag.c (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/http/http_etag.c Tue Mar 9 18:15:22 > 2021 > @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static char *make_digest_etag(request_re > } > > if ((status = apr_file_seek(fd, APR_END, &len)) != APR_SUCCESS) { > - ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, status, r, APLOGNO() > + ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, status, r, APLOGNO(10258) > "Make etag: could not seek"); > if (er->pathname) { > apr_file_close(fd); > >
