On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:05:14PM +0000, Joe Orton wrote: > I would like to call a VOTE over the next week to release this candidate > tarball as v2.16: > > [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > MD5, SHA-256, and SHA-512 checksums for the tarball are as follows: > > c0f4fbeee7514ea22a038933d0075f8e libapreq2-2.16.tar.gz > e04c855a3ea070b8863569fbae02fe828f534ac88755b23e24d3863cc9598349 > libapreq2-2.16.tar.gz > aa9e751a3f0d6a9cb587aa1c5408e8d9a073560860d7f653776196fe3739516df16abe943c9cb0460cfb9b68a2d79ad651cfd5e4a30a2ca34d6dc3ced73f628c > libapreq2-2.16.tar.gz
+1 for release from me, builds and tests OK. I wonder if the embedded libapreq2 library version (APREQ_*_VERSION in library/apreq_versions.h) should be bumped from 2.8.1, it seems to be disconenected from the tarball release version, but this doesn't seem harmful. I'll let the vote run for a few more hours then tally a result. Regards, Joe
