Le 10/05/2021 à 10:32, Ruediger Pluem a écrit :
On 5/10/21 10:06 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Team, me is confused about the status of CHANGES and changes-entries. Could we
clarify for everyone how things are supposed to work now?
There was some back and forth in the past, the README.CHANGES says both are
valid and on backport proposals people seem to prefer the entries (which I
agree with).
Just a clear "this is how we do this from now on" from our chair would be
appreciated. Thanks!
I think we should find a consensus here as a group. I proposed the
changes-entries setup and I think that it has benefits. But I
wanted to give people time to get used to it and wanted to be sure that the
setup does not contain bugs I haven't caught or
thought of. In addition I as an individual of this group cannot tell people how
they should do things. I can only propose
approaches and hopefully the majority finds them beneficial and we as a whole
decide to use them.
My personal opinion is +1 to use the change-entries approach.
+1 as well for me.
Regards
Rüdiger
