On 6/4/21 8:35 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> Is it ok that we include an os-specific API into the main code, not
> into the APR project?
You mean because the patch uses pthread_sigmask / sigprocmask?
IMHO this is ok as:
1. Prefork is not OS generic.
2. APR currently does not offer what we need here. Getting an appropriate API
in a stable version of APR would require
to release a new minor version of APR (1.8.x) first.
3. It would require raising the minimum version for APR in httpd to 1.8. This
might be fine for trunk, but should not be
done for 2.4.x where we would like to backport this fix to.
Regards
Rüdiger
